Free Nevada Life Insurance & Annuities Practice Questions

Insurance only deals with pure risk: situations where there's a chance of loss or no loss, but no chance of gain (like your house burning down). Speculative risk involves a chance of loss, no loss, OR gain. That's gambling and investing, and insurers won't touch it. If there's an upside, it's not insurable.

Keep these three straight and you'll bank easy points all day: a peril is the cause of loss (fire, wind, theft), a hazard is something that increases the chance or severity of that loss, and risk is the uncertainty of loss itself. The peril is the thing that actually does the damage.

A hazard doesn't cause the loss itself; it just makes a loss more likely or more severe. Icy steps, frayed wiring, a careless attitude: none of those start the fire or the fall, but they tip the odds. Causes of loss are perils; hazards just stack the deck.

Moral hazard equals dishonesty. It's the risk that someone deliberately causes or exaggerates a loss to profit, like torching a failing business for the payout. Don't mix it up with morale hazard (carelessness, choice B) or physical hazard (the actual physical conditions in A and D).

Morale hazard is the 'eh, I'm covered' attitude: indifference or carelessness that creeps in because insurance exists. It's not dishonesty (that's moral hazard) and it's not a physical condition (physical hazard). Trick to remember: moralE hazard is about a person's lazy attitudE.

A physical hazard is a tangible condition that increases the likelihood or severity of a loss: gasoline in the garage, a slippery floor, frayed wiring. You can see or touch it. If it's an attitude problem it's morale; if it's dishonesty it's moral; if it's a physical thing sitting there raising the odds, it's physical.

An insurer can't predict whether your house specifically will burn down, but give them a big enough pool of similar homes and they can predict pretty accurately how many out of the whole group will. That's the law of large numbers: more similar exposures, more reliable predictions. It's the statistical engine that makes pricing coverage possible at all.

Buying insurance is the classic risk transfer: you hand the financial consequences of a loss to the insurer in exchange for a premium. Avoidance means not doing the risky thing at all, retention means keeping the risk yourself (like a deductible), and reduction means lowering the odds or severity (smoke detectors). Insurance equals transfer.

Indemnity is the whole heartbeat of insurance: you get made whole, not rich. The goal is to put you back where you were financially right before the loss, no better, no worse. That's why you can't insure a $20,000 car for $80,000 and cash in. Insurance reimburses a loss; it doesn't hand out winnings.

Insurers like risks that are accidental (due to chance, not intentional) and definite and measurable (you can pin down when, where, and how much). Add in 'predictable for large groups,' 'not catastrophic to the insurer,' and 'affordable premium,' and you've got the recipe for an insurable risk. A loss someone causes on purpose? Not insurable.

Key person (or key employee) insurance protects the business itself against losing someone whose death would really hurt the bottom line. The business owns the policy, pays the premiums, and is the beneficiary. If the key person dies, the company gets funds to cover the disruption and find a replacement.

A buy-sell agreement is a pre-arranged deal: when an owner dies, the surviving owners (or the business) buy out the deceased's share, and life insurance provides the cash to fund the purchase. It keeps the business in the right hands and gives the deceased owner's family a fair payout without a fire sale.

In a cross-purchase plan, each owner buys a policy on each of the other owners, so they personally buy out a deceased partner's share. Compare that to an entity (stock redemption) plan, where the business owns the policies and does the buying. Cross-purchase equals owners insuring each other; entity equals the company insuring the owners.

In a Section 162 executive bonus plan, the employer pays the premium as a bonus, but the executive owns the policy and names the beneficiary. The bonus is tax-deductible to the employer and taxable income to the executive. The big perk: the employee keeps the policy even if they leave.

On the personal side, life insurance commonly covers final expenses, replaces lost income for a family, pays off a mortgage, and provides liquidity so heirs can cover estate taxes without selling assets in a hurry. Insuring equipment or buildings is property insurance, not life.

At its core, life insurance is income replacement: making sure the people who depend on you financially aren't left stranded if you're gone. Cash value growth, estate planning, and business uses are all real, but protecting dependents' income is the bread-and-butter purpose.

The human life value (HLV) approach asks: what's the dollar value of this person's future income to their family? It estimates the years of earnings left, adjusts to present value, and that's the coverage target. It's an income-based lens, versus the needs approach, which adds up specific obligations instead.

The needs approach tallies up the actual bills the family faces if the insured dies: final expenses, paying off the mortgage, an income fund for survivors, kids' education, an emergency cushion. Add them up, subtract existing resources, and the gap is how much coverage is needed.

Immediate (or cash) needs are the bills that hit right away: funeral and burial costs, final medical expenses, and outstanding debts. Ongoing income for survivors and future college costs are different buckets, classified as income needs and future needs rather than immediate cash needs.

You don't insure what's already covered. After totaling the family's needs, subtract the resources they already have: savings, investments, existing life insurance, Social Security survivor benefits. What's left is the true coverage gap the new policy should fill.

Term is pure, no-frills protection: it covers you for a set period (10, 20, 30 years, or to a certain age) and pays only if you die during that window. No cash value, no investment piece, just the death benefit, which is why it's the cheapest way to buy a big chunk of coverage.

With decreasing term, the death benefit shrinks over the term while the premium stays level, which makes it a natural fit for a mortgage: as you pay the loan down, you need less coverage to pay it off. It's cheaper than level term because the insurer's risk drops each year.

The renewable feature lets you keep coverage going at the end of the term without proving you're still healthy, which is valuable if your health has declined. The catch: the premium jumps at each renewal because you're older. Renewability protects insurability, not your wallet.

Convertible term lets you swap your term policy for a permanent one (like whole life) without a new medical exam, even if your health has tanked. The new premium is based on your age at conversion. It's a built-in escape hatch from 'temporary' to 'permanent' coverage.

Level term keeps both the death benefit and the premium flat for the whole term, the most common and predictable flavor. Contrast that with decreasing term (benefit drops, premium level) and increasing term (benefit rises). 'Level' means nothing moves while the term runs.

Annual renewable term renews every single year with no evidence of insurability needed, but the premium climbs each year as you age and mortality risk rises. It starts cheap and gets pricier over time, the opposite of a level-premium permanent policy.

Whole life is the workhorse of permanent insurance: lifelong coverage, level premiums that never change, a guaranteed death benefit, and guaranteed cash value that builds over time. You pay more than term, but you get permanence plus a savings element with guarantees attached.

Cash value grows tax-deferred: you don't pay taxes on the gains as they accumulate inside the policy. Tax can come into play later if you surrender for more than your basis, but year to year, that internal growth isn't taxed. Deferred, not necessarily tax-free.

Limited-pay whole life compresses the premium payments into a set number of years (20-pay, 30-pay, paid-up-at-65). You pay higher premiums but finish paying sooner, and the policy stays in force for life. Coverage is still permanent; you just stop writing checks early.

Endowment is the point where the cash value catches up to the face amount and the policy 'matures.' On older whole life policies that's age 100; newer ones push it to 121. If the insured lives that long, the insurer pays out the face amount as a maturity benefit.

The free look (sometimes called the right-to-examine period) lets the owner return the policy within a set number of days, usually 10, for a full refund of every dollar paid. Think of it like a receipt-in-hand store return: you get cash back, not a store credit. It exists because a life policy is a big commitment people often buy on an agent's recommendation, so the law builds in a cooling-off window.

The grace period (commonly about a month, often 30 or 31 days) keeps the policy in force even after a premium is missed, so coverage doesn't lapse the moment a payment is late. If the insured dies during that window the company still pays; it just subtracts the premium that was owed. The grace period protects against accidental lapse, and the only catch at death is the company collecting what it was already due.

Reinstatement lets an owner revive a lapsed policy instead of buying a new one, which matters because the old policy keeps its original (lower) issue-age premium. The trade-off: the insurer can ask for evidence of insurability (you still have to be insurable) plus the back premiums with interest. Remember it as prove you're healthy and catch up on what you owe. A new two-year contestable period usually starts on the reinstated coverage.

The incontestability clause says that once a policy has been in force for two years during the insured's lifetime, the company can no longer contest it over misstatements on the application. The point is to protect beneficiaries from a company digging up a minor error years later to dodge a claim. After two years the application is essentially locked, so honest mistakes can't sink the payout. (Outright fraud and nonpayment of premium are the usual exceptions.)

The misstatement of age (or sex) provision is a fix-it clause, not a gotcha. Because premium is based on age, the company simply recalculates and pays the death benefit the premiums actually paid would have purchased at the true age. Understate your age and the payout shrinks a bit, but the policy isn't canceled. It adjusts the benefit; it doesn't kill the claim.

The entire contract is the policy itself plus a copy of the application attached to it, and nothing else. The insurer can't incorporate by reference some outside document, like its bylaws or underwriting guidelines, to change your rights later, and the agent's side comments don't count. If it isn't in the policy or the attached application, it isn't part of the deal.

A policy loan borrows against the cash value of a permanent policy, and the insurer can't refuse a properly requested loan up to the available cash value. If the loan isn't paid back it doesn't void anything; the company just subtracts the outstanding balance plus interest from the death benefit. A policy loan is essentially your own money, so at death the company nets it out rather than denying the claim.

The automatic premium loan (APL) is a safety net: if a premium goes unpaid past the grace period, the company automatically borrows it from your cash value so the policy doesn't lapse. It quietly keeps coverage alive, though each rescue is a loan that chips away at cash value and, if left unpaid, the death benefit. Picture it as the policy paying its own premium out of the cash value you've built.

A collateral assignment is a partial, temporary transfer: you pledge the policy (usually its death benefit up to the loan amount) as collateral, and once the debt is paid the rights revert to you. Compare that to an absolute assignment, which is a complete, permanent transfer of ownership. Easy hook: collateral assignment is literally as collateral for a loan (partial), while absolute means absolutely everything (full).

Beneficiaries are arranged in line: the primary is first, and the contingent (secondary) is the backup. If the primary isn't living when the insured dies, the proceeds drop down to the contingent beneficiary. The estate only gets involved when no named beneficiary survives. Think contingent equals contingency plan, the backup who steps in.

Life insurance hedges the risk of dying too soon and leaving dependents short. An annuity hedges the opposite risk: living too long and running out of money. That's why an annuity is essentially a vehicle for the systematic liquidation of an estate, turning a sum of money into income you can't outlive. Easy hook: life insurance is for dying too soon, an annuity is for living too long.

The annuitant is the measuring life: their age and life expectancy drive how big each income payment is, because the insurer is calculating how long it will likely have to pay. The annuitant is often, but not always, the same person as the owner. Think of the annuitant as the yardstick the insurer measures the payout against.

If the annuitant dies before income payments begin, the accumulated value generally passes to the named beneficiary, much like a death benefit. The annuity doesn't simply disappear into the insurer's pocket. (Once payments have begun, what's left depends on which payout option was chosen.) Hook: die during the build-up phase, and the beneficiary collects what's been saved.

During accumulation (also called the pay-in or savings phase), the owner contributes money and the contract value grows without being taxed each year. Nothing is paid out yet; the payout, or annuitization, stage comes later. Hook: accumulation equals money going in and compounding tax-deferred.

Annuitization is the switch from saving to spending: the owner converts the accumulated value into a guaranteed income stream and chooses a payout option that sets how long, and to whom, payments run. Once you annuitize, you've generally traded the lump sum for the income. Hook: annuitize means turn the pile of money into a paycheck.

A variable annuity tracks your money in accumulation units while you're paying in, and their value rises and falls with the separate-account subaccounts. When you annuitize, those convert into annuity units, which then determine each variable income payment. Hook: accumulation units are the saving-phase scoreboard, annuity units are the paying-phase scoreboard.

An immediate annuity is bought with one lump sum and starts paying right away, within one payment interval, so within a month for monthly payments or within a year for annual ones. It's popular with retirees who have a lump sum and want income now. Hook: immediate means income starts almost immediately, and it must be single premium, since you can't flexibly fund something that's already paying out.

A deferred annuity postpones the income phase, sometimes by decades, while the money grows tax-deferred in the meantime. It's the accumulation-focused cousin of the immediate annuity. Hook: deferred means the payout is deferred to later, so it's built for growing money before you need the income.

A flexible premium annuity lets you fund it on your own schedule, more this year, less or nothing next, rather than with one fixed lump sum. By definition these are deferred, because you can't keep adding money to a contract that's already paying out. Hook: flexible premium equals flexible deposits, and it's always a deferred contract.

A single premium annuity is bought with one lump sum up front and takes no further deposits. It can be immediate (income starts now) or deferred (income later), but either way the funding is one-and-done. Hook: single premium means a single payment buys the whole contract.

A life insurance death benefit paid as a lump sum is generally received free of federal income tax, no matter the size. That income-tax-free payout is one of the biggest reasons life insurance is such a powerful planning tool. Hook: the lump-sum death benefit lands in the beneficiary's hands income-tax-free.

The death benefit itself stays income-tax-free even when paid out over time, but any interest the insurer credits while holding the money is taxable income to the beneficiary. Hook: the original benefit is tax-free; the earnings on top of it are not, just like interest in any account.

Although the death benefit is income-tax-free, it can still be pulled into the insured's taxable estate if the insured kept incidents of ownership, such as the right to change the beneficiary, take a loan, or surrender the policy. Removing those controls (often through an irrevocable life insurance trust) is how planners keep proceeds out of the taxable estate. Hook: income-tax-free is not the same as estate-tax-free, and control is what drags it into the estate.

Normally death benefits are income-tax-free, but the transfer-for-value rule says that if a policy is sold or transferred for valuable consideration, the portion of the benefit above the buyer's cost can become taxable income. There are key exceptions (transfers to the insured, a business partner, a partnership, or a corporation in which the insured is an officer or shareholder). Hook: sell a policy for value and you can taint the tax-free payout, unless an exception applies.

The cash value in a permanent policy grows tax-deferred, meaning there's no annual tax on the inside buildup as long as the policy stays in force. This is one of the quiet advantages of permanent insurance over a fully taxable account. Hook: nothing is taxed on the growth while the policy is alive and intact.

A policy loan from a life policy that stays in force is generally not a taxable event, because it's a loan rather than income; you're borrowing against your own cash value. The catch: if the policy later lapses or is surrendered with a loan outstanding and a gain, the previously untaxed gain can become taxable. (And these rules tighten if the policy is a MEC.) Hook: a loan isn't income, so it isn't taxed, as long as the policy stays in force.

When you surrender a policy, you get your cost basis (total premiums paid) back tax-free, but any gain above that basis is taxed as ordinary income, not as a capital gain. Hook: basis comes back tax-free, the gain on top is ordinary income.

Premiums on personal life insurance are paid with after-tax dollars and are not deductible. The trade-off for that is the income-tax-free death benefit on the back end. Hook: no deduction going in, but a tax-free benefit coming out; the IRS won't let you have it both ways.

Because a dividend is treated as a return of overpaid premium, it isn't taxable when paid. But if you leave it to accumulate at interest, that interest is taxable, the same logic found everywhere in tax: your own money back is free, earnings on it are taxed. Hook: dividend equals return of premium (free), interest on it equals earnings (taxed).

A MEC results when a policy is funded faster than the 7-pay test allows, essentially cramming too much premium in too soon, which Congress decided looked more like an investment than insurance. The death benefit stays income-tax-free, but the living benefits lose their friendly tax treatment. Hook: overfund it past the 7-pay limit and it gets reclassified as a MEC.